- New github_close_pr tool distinct from github_close_issue; proper PR wording in tool output, audit records, and gh pr close (not issue close) - handle_read detects art_/call_/SHA refs and points to retrieve_tool_result with copy-pasteable hints; error messages show correct tool for each ref type - Shell delta tool results include the command field so the UI can resolve task_id-only exec cells when the completion metadata arrives - Sidebar background shell tasks show the actual command on the primary row instead of just the task ID; task ID stays available as dim detail - Tool routing falls back to task_id when exec_shell_wait has no command, then updates when the completion carries command metadata - Plan mode prompt explains update_plan as the handoff signal; model waits for user action instead of continuing to tool around - Base prompt clarifies handle_read scope (var_handles only) vs retrieve_tool_result (artifacts/tool-result refs) - New tests: close_pr_schema, close distinction wording, handle_read artifact detection, shell_wait task_id fallback, sidebar background task labels
7.5 KiB
Contributing to codewhale
Thank you for your interest in contributing to codewhale! This document provides guidelines and instructions for contributing.
Getting Started
Prerequisites
- Rust 1.88 or later (edition 2024)
- Cargo package manager
- Git
Setting Up Development Environment
-
Fork and clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/CodeWhale.git cd CodeWhale -
Build the project:
cargo build -
Run tests:
cargo test --workspace --all-features -
Run with development settings:
cargo run --bin codewhale
Development Workflow
Code Style
- Run
cargo fmtbefore committing to ensure consistent formatting - Run
cargo clippyand address all warnings - Follow Rust naming conventions (snake_case for functions/variables, CamelCase for types)
- Add documentation comments for public APIs
Testing
- Write tests for new functionality
- Ensure all existing tests pass:
cargo test --workspace --all-features - Colocate unit tests beside the code they cover (standard Rust
#[cfg(test)]modules), and add integration tests under the owning crate'stests/directory (for examplecrates/tui/tests/orcrates/state/tests/). The repository roottests/directory is not used
Commit Messages
Use clear, descriptive commit messages following conventional commits:
feat:New featurefix:Bug fixdocs:Documentation changesrefactor:Code refactoringtest:Adding or updating testschore:Maintenance tasks
Example: feat: add doctor subcommand for system diagnostics
When a commit harvests code from a community PR (see "How Your Contribution
Lands" below), include a Harvested from PR #N by @author line in the commit
body. An auto-close workflow watches for this pattern and closes the
referenced PR with credit so the contributor gets a clear signal that
their work shipped.
How Your Contribution Lands
We follow a deliberate "land what's useful, credit the contributor" model that occasionally surprises new contributors. Two paths:
Path 1 — Direct merge
If your PR is well-scoped, passes CI, doesn't touch the trust-boundary surface (auth / sandbox / publishing / branding), and doesn't conflict with main, a maintainer merges it directly. This is the most common outcome for small bug fixes and well-tested feature additions.
Path 2 — Harvest
If your PR is large, mixes scope, conflicts with main, or needs polish
that's faster for the maintainer to apply than to round-trip with the
contributor, the maintainer may harvest the useful commits or hunks
into a new commit on main rather than merging the PR directly. This is
not a rejection — it means your code landed.
When this happens:
- The harvested commit's message includes
Harvested from PR #N by @your-handle. This is the contract: that line is your credit and the signal that your contribution shipped. - The
CHANGELOG.mdentry for the next release credits you by handle. - The auto-close workflow closes your PR with a templated thank-you and
a link to the commit on
main.
To make a future contribution land via the faster Direct-Merge path instead of the Harvest path, the highest-leverage things you can do are:
- Keep PRs single-purpose. One bug fix per PR; one feature per PR. Don't mix a refactor with a feature.
- Rebase onto current
mainbefore opening the PR, and after CI feedback. Conflicts force the harvest path even when the change is small. - Include tests with new behavior. The maintainer often harvests PRs without tests because adding the test is faster than asking the contributor for one.
- Avoid the trust-boundary surface without prior maintainer
sign-off. That includes auth/credential flows, sandbox policy,
publishing/release plumbing, and
prompts/content. PRs that touch these without prior discussion are unlikely to merge directly even when the change is well-implemented.
Project Structure
codewhale is a Cargo workspace. The live runtime and the majority of TUI,
engine, and tool code currently live in crates/tui/src/. Smaller workspace
crates provide shared abstractions that are being extracted incrementally.
crates/
├── tui/ codewhale-tui binary (interactive TUI + runtime API)
├── cli/ codewhale binary (dispatcher facade)
├── app-server/ HTTP/SSE + JSON-RPC transport
├── core/ Agent loop / session / turn management
├── protocol/ Request/response framing
├── config/ Config loading, profiles, env precedence
├── state/ SQLite thread/session persistence
├── tools/ Typed tool specs and lifecycle
├── mcp/ MCP client + stdio server
├── hooks/ Lifecycle hooks (stdout/jsonl/webhook)
├── execpolicy/ Approval/sandbox policy engine
├── agent/ Model/provider registry
└── tui-core/ Event-driven TUI state machine scaffold
See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for the live data flow across these crates, including the bottom-up build order.
Submitting Changes
-
Create a feature branch from
main:git checkout -b feat/your-feature -
Make your changes and commit them
-
Ensure CI passes:
cargo fmt --all -- --check cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features cargo test --workspace --all-features -
Push your branch and create a Pull Request
-
Describe your changes clearly in the PR description
Pull Request Guidelines
- Keep PRs focused on a single change
- Update documentation if needed
- Add tests for new functionality
- Ensure CI passes before requesting review
Shape of a Typical PR
A well-structured PR follows a consistent pattern. Recent exemplars include:
- #386 —
/initcommand: newcrates/tui/src/commands/init.rsmodule, project-type detection, AGENTS.md generation, command registration incommands/mod.rs, localization strings. - #389 — Inline LSP diagnostics: LSP subsystem in
crates/tui/src/lsp/, engine hooks incore/engine/lsp_hooks.rs, config toggle, test coverage. - #387 — Self-update: new
crates/cli/src/update.rsmodule, CLI subcommand registration, HTTP download + SHA256 verification + atomic binary replacement. - #393 —
/sharesession URL: newcrates/tui/src/commands/share.rs, HTML rendering,gh gist createintegration, command registration. - #343/#346 — (v0.8.5) Runtime thread/turn timeline and durable task manager refactors.
Typically each PR touches 1–3 new files, modifies 2–5 existing files for wiring (registries, dispatch matches, localization), and adds or updates tests. Changes are scoped to a single feature or fix — if you discover related work that needs doing, open a separate issue rather than expanding the PR scope.
Before submitting, run:
cargo fmt --check
cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features 2>&1 | head -50
cargo check
Reporting Issues
When reporting issues, please include:
- Operating system and version
- Rust version (
rustc --version) - codewhale version (
codewhale --version) - Steps to reproduce the issue
- Expected vs actual behavior
- Relevant error messages or logs
Code of Conduct
Be respectful and inclusive. We welcome contributors of all backgrounds and experience levels.
License
By contributing to codewhale, you agree that your contributions will be licensed under the MIT License.
Questions?
Feel free to open an issue for any questions about contributing.