ci: auto-close PRs whose code is harvested into main
Solves the long-standing hygiene problem where contributor PRs whose code lands via maintainer cherry-pick stay open + CONFLICTING forever, even though their fix is credited in the CHANGELOG. v0.8.29 alone left ~5 such PRs open (#1421, #1429, #1442, #1465 — verified separately). New workflow `.github/workflows/auto-close-harvested.yml`: * Triggers on push to main. * For each commit in the push, scans the commit body for lines matching `harvested from (PR )?#N` (case-insensitive). * For each matched PR number, closes the PR with a templated thank-you that links back to the merged commit, thanks the contributor by handle, and points them at CONTRIBUTING for landing future PRs via the faster direct-merge path. * Idempotent — already-closed PRs are skipped with a log line, not an error. * Concurrency-guarded so two near-simultaneous main pushes can't both try to close the same PR. Two commit-message patterns are recognised: * `Harvested from PR #1234 by @username` (preferred form, used in the templates the maintainer paste-uses for harvests) * `harvested from #1234` (case-insensitive fallback for older / shorter forms) The convention is documented in CONTRIBUTING.md, which also adds a new "How Your Contribution Lands" section explaining the harvest model upfront so contributors know what to expect — closing their PR isn't rejection, and the credit lives in the commit message and CHANGELOG. Permissions on the workflow: `pull-requests: write` to close + comment, `issues: write` for the comment (PR comments are issue comments under the hood), `contents: read` for the checkout.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
|
||||
name: Auto-close harvested PRs
|
||||
|
||||
# When a commit on main contains a "Harvested from PR #N" line in its
|
||||
# message, close PR #N with a templated thank-you that links back to
|
||||
# the merged commit. Solves the long-standing problem where contributor
|
||||
# PRs whose code lands via maintainer cherry-pick stay open and
|
||||
# `CONFLICTING` forever, even though their fix is credited in the
|
||||
# CHANGELOG.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The expected commit-message convention is documented in
|
||||
# CONTRIBUTING.md. Two patterns are recognised:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# * `Harvested from PR #1234 by @username` (preferred)
|
||||
# * `harvested from #1234` (case-insensitive fallback)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The first match's PR number is closed; multiple PRs can be closed
|
||||
# per commit by repeating the line. The match runs on the commit
|
||||
# body only, not on the subject line, so the subject can describe
|
||||
# the change naturally without baking a number into it.
|
||||
|
||||
on:
|
||||
push:
|
||||
branches: [main]
|
||||
|
||||
permissions:
|
||||
contents: read
|
||||
pull-requests: write
|
||||
issues: write
|
||||
|
||||
# Only one auto-close run at a time so two near-simultaneous main
|
||||
# pushes can't both try to close the same PR (the second would just
|
||||
# fail with "Pull request is already closed", harmless but noisy).
|
||||
concurrency:
|
||||
group: auto-close-harvested
|
||||
cancel-in-progress: false
|
||||
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
close:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
|
||||
with:
|
||||
# We need at least the commits that this push introduced.
|
||||
# fetch-depth: 0 is the simplest correct option; the
|
||||
# alternative (fetching just `before..after`) is fragile
|
||||
# when force-pushes happen.
|
||||
fetch-depth: 0
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Close PRs referenced by harvested-from lines
|
||||
env:
|
||||
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
|
||||
BEFORE_SHA: ${{ github.event.before }}
|
||||
AFTER_SHA: ${{ github.event.after }}
|
||||
shell: bash
|
||||
run: |
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
# The first push to a fresh branch has BEFORE_SHA = 0000…0000.
|
||||
# In that case fall back to the latest commit only — we don't
|
||||
# want to scan the entire history.
|
||||
if [[ "${BEFORE_SHA}" == "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" || -z "${BEFORE_SHA:-}" ]]; then
|
||||
RANGE="${AFTER_SHA}"
|
||||
RANGE_ARGS=("-1" "${AFTER_SHA}")
|
||||
else
|
||||
RANGE="${BEFORE_SHA}..${AFTER_SHA}"
|
||||
RANGE_ARGS=("${RANGE}")
|
||||
fi
|
||||
echo "Scanning commit range: ${RANGE}"
|
||||
|
||||
# `git log --format=%H%n%B%n--END--` separates commits with a
|
||||
# sentinel so multi-line bodies don't get mangled.
|
||||
mapfile -t commits < <(git log "${RANGE_ARGS[@]}" --format="%H")
|
||||
|
||||
if [[ ${#commits[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
|
||||
echo "No commits in range; nothing to do."
|
||||
exit 0
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
declare -A processed_prs=()
|
||||
|
||||
for sha in "${commits[@]}"; do
|
||||
body="$(git log -1 --format=%B "${sha}")"
|
||||
# Two patterns, both case-insensitive on the keyword:
|
||||
# "Harvested from PR #1234 by @username" (preferred form)
|
||||
# "harvested from #1234" (short form)
|
||||
mapfile -t pr_numbers < <(
|
||||
printf '%s\n' "${body}" \
|
||||
| grep -oiE 'harvested from (pr )?#[0-9]+' \
|
||||
| grep -oE '#[0-9]+' \
|
||||
| tr -d '#' \
|
||||
| sort -u || true
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if [[ ${#pr_numbers[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
|
||||
continue
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
short_sha="${sha:0:12}"
|
||||
subject="$(git log -1 --format=%s "${sha}")"
|
||||
|
||||
for pr in "${pr_numbers[@]}"; do
|
||||
key="${pr}-${sha}"
|
||||
if [[ -n "${processed_prs[${key}]:-}" ]]; then
|
||||
continue
|
||||
fi
|
||||
processed_prs[${key}]=1
|
||||
|
||||
# Idempotency: skip if the PR is already closed.
|
||||
state="$(gh pr view "${pr}" --json state --jq .state 2>/dev/null || echo "MISSING")"
|
||||
if [[ "${state}" == "CLOSED" || "${state}" == "MERGED" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "PR #${pr} is already ${state}; skipping."
|
||||
continue
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [[ "${state}" == "MISSING" ]]; then
|
||||
echo "::warning::PR #${pr} not found or inaccessible; skipping."
|
||||
continue
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
author="$(gh pr view "${pr}" --json author --jq '.author.login' 2>/dev/null || echo "")"
|
||||
greeting="Hi"
|
||||
if [[ -n "${author}" ]]; then
|
||||
greeting="Thanks @${author}"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
body_text=$(cat <<EOF
|
||||
${greeting} — your contribution landed in [\`${short_sha}\`](https://github.com/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/commit/${sha}) on \`main\`:
|
||||
|
||||
> ${subject}
|
||||
|
||||
Closing this PR now that the code is on \`main\`. Credit lives in the commit message and (where applicable) the \`CHANGELOG.md\` entry for the next release. Apologies for not closing this at the time of the merge — the auto-close workflow is new in v0.8.31.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to land more work and would prefer your future PRs merge cleanly without a harvest step, the [\`CONTRIBUTING.md\`](https://github.com/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) doc has a short note on what makes a contribution mergeable as-is.
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
echo "Closing PR #${pr} (harvested in ${short_sha})"
|
||||
if ! gh pr close "${pr}" \
|
||||
--repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" \
|
||||
--comment "${body_text}"; then
|
||||
echo "::warning::Failed to close PR #${pr}; continuing"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
done
|
||||
done
|
||||
|
||||
echo "Auto-close pass complete."
|
||||
@@ -64,6 +64,58 @@ Use clear, descriptive commit messages following conventional commits:
|
||||
|
||||
Example: `feat: add doctor subcommand for system diagnostics`
|
||||
|
||||
When a commit harvests code from a community PR (see "How Your Contribution
|
||||
Lands" below), include a `Harvested from PR #N by @author` line in the commit
|
||||
body. An auto-close workflow watches for this pattern and closes the
|
||||
referenced PR with credit so the contributor gets a clear signal that
|
||||
their work shipped.
|
||||
|
||||
## How Your Contribution Lands
|
||||
|
||||
We follow a deliberate "land what's useful, credit the contributor" model
|
||||
that occasionally surprises new contributors. Two paths:
|
||||
|
||||
### Path 1 — Direct merge
|
||||
|
||||
If your PR is well-scoped, passes CI, doesn't touch the trust-boundary
|
||||
surface (auth / sandbox / publishing / branding), and doesn't conflict
|
||||
with main, a maintainer merges it directly. This is the most common
|
||||
outcome for small bug fixes and well-tested feature additions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Path 2 — Harvest
|
||||
|
||||
If your PR is large, mixes scope, conflicts with main, or needs polish
|
||||
that's faster for the maintainer to apply than to round-trip with the
|
||||
contributor, the maintainer may **harvest** the useful commits or hunks
|
||||
into a new commit on `main` rather than merging the PR directly. This is
|
||||
**not a rejection** — it means your code landed.
|
||||
|
||||
When this happens:
|
||||
|
||||
- The harvested commit's message includes `Harvested from PR #N by
|
||||
@your-handle`. This is the contract: that line is your credit and the
|
||||
signal that your contribution shipped.
|
||||
- The `CHANGELOG.md` entry for the next release credits you by handle.
|
||||
- The auto-close workflow closes your PR with a templated thank-you and
|
||||
a link to the commit on `main`.
|
||||
|
||||
To make a future contribution land via the faster Direct-Merge path
|
||||
instead of the Harvest path, the highest-leverage things you can do are:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Keep PRs single-purpose.** One bug fix per PR; one feature per PR.
|
||||
Don't mix a refactor with a feature.
|
||||
2. **Rebase onto current `main` before opening the PR**, and after CI
|
||||
feedback. Conflicts force the harvest path even when the change is
|
||||
small.
|
||||
3. **Include tests** with new behavior. The maintainer often harvests
|
||||
PRs without tests because adding the test is faster than asking the
|
||||
contributor for one.
|
||||
4. **Avoid the trust-boundary surface** without prior maintainer
|
||||
sign-off. That includes auth/credential flows, sandbox policy,
|
||||
publishing/release plumbing, and `prompts/` content. PRs that touch
|
||||
these without prior discussion are unlikely to merge directly even
|
||||
when the change is well-implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project Structure
|
||||
|
||||
DeepSeek TUI is a Cargo workspace. The live runtime and the majority of TUI,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user