a3acdbe70b
Sweep brand mentions of `DeepSeek TUI` / `deepseek-tui` / bare `deepseek` (the dispatcher binary) across all user-facing docs to the new `codewhale` brand. The DeepSeek **provider** integration is left untouched throughout: env vars (`DEEPSEEK_*`), model IDs (`deepseek-v4-pro`, `deepseek-v4-flash`, `deepseek-chat`, `deepseek-reasoner`), the `api.deepseek.com` host, the `~/.deepseek/` config dir, and the `--provider deepseek` argument value all keep the legacy spelling. Anti-scope items deliberately left as the legacy `deepseek-tui`: - Homebrew tap and formula (`Hmbown/homebrew-deepseek-tui`, `brew install deepseek-tui`, `scoop install deepseek-tui`). The tap rename ships separately. - Docker image (`ghcr.io/hmbown/deepseek-tui`). Image-tag rename ships separately. - CNB mirror namespace (`cnb.cool/deepseek-tui.com/DeepSeek-TUI`). Third-party hosted path. - Security contact email (`security@deepseek-tui.com`). - GitHub repo URL (`Hmbown/DeepSeek-TUI`). New artifact: - `docs/REBRAND.md` documents what changed, what didn't, the deprecation window, and migration commands for npm / Cargo / Homebrew / manual installs. CHANGELOG entries: - Root `CHANGELOG.md` and `crates/tui/CHANGELOG.md` both gain a new `[Unreleased]` section describing the rename and the one- release deprecation window. Historical entries are untouched. Issue templates: - `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md` and `feature_request.md` refer to "codewhale" / `codewhale --version` instead of the old brand name in their environment fields. The rebrand sweep was driven by a perl script with bulk patterns (`deepseek-tui` -> `codewhale-tui`, `DeepSeek TUI` -> `codewhale`, bare `deepseek` -> `codewhale` with provider/model/host/env-var/ config-path negative lookbehind/lookahead) followed by targeted reverts for the anti-scope items above. Output was visually reviewed file-by-file before committing. Verified: - `cargo check --workspace --all-targets --locked` — pass. - `cargo test --workspace --all-features --locked` — pass (no test source touched here; suite stayed green to confirm no doc-from-string assertions broke). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
220 lines
7.4 KiB
Markdown
220 lines
7.4 KiB
Markdown
# Contributing to codewhale
|
||
|
||
Thank you for your interest in contributing to codewhale! This document provides guidelines and instructions for contributing.
|
||
|
||
## Getting Started
|
||
|
||
### Prerequisites
|
||
|
||
- Rust 1.88 or later (edition 2024)
|
||
- Cargo package manager
|
||
- Git
|
||
|
||
### Setting Up Development Environment
|
||
|
||
1. Fork and clone the repository:
|
||
```bash
|
||
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/DeepSeek-TUI.git
|
||
cd DeepSeek-TUI
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
2. Build the project:
|
||
```bash
|
||
cargo build
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
3. Run tests:
|
||
```bash
|
||
cargo test
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
4. Run with development settings:
|
||
```bash
|
||
cargo run
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Development Workflow
|
||
|
||
### Code Style
|
||
|
||
- Run `cargo fmt` before committing to ensure consistent formatting
|
||
- Run `cargo clippy` and address all warnings
|
||
- Follow Rust naming conventions (snake_case for functions/variables, CamelCase for types)
|
||
- Add documentation comments for public APIs
|
||
|
||
### Testing
|
||
|
||
- Write tests for new functionality
|
||
- Ensure all existing tests pass: `cargo test --workspace --all-features`
|
||
- Colocate unit tests beside the code they cover (standard Rust `#[cfg(test)]`
|
||
modules), and add integration tests under the owning crate's `tests/`
|
||
directory (for example `crates/tui/tests/` or `crates/state/tests/`). The
|
||
repository root `tests/` directory is not used
|
||
|
||
### Commit Messages
|
||
|
||
Use clear, descriptive commit messages following conventional commits:
|
||
|
||
- `feat:` New feature
|
||
- `fix:` Bug fix
|
||
- `docs:` Documentation changes
|
||
- `refactor:` Code refactoring
|
||
- `test:` Adding or updating tests
|
||
- `chore:` Maintenance tasks
|
||
|
||
Example: `feat: add doctor subcommand for system diagnostics`
|
||
|
||
When a commit harvests code from a community PR (see "How Your Contribution
|
||
Lands" below), include a `Harvested from PR #N by @author` line in the commit
|
||
body. An auto-close workflow watches for this pattern and closes the
|
||
referenced PR with credit so the contributor gets a clear signal that
|
||
their work shipped.
|
||
|
||
## How Your Contribution Lands
|
||
|
||
We follow a deliberate "land what's useful, credit the contributor" model
|
||
that occasionally surprises new contributors. Two paths:
|
||
|
||
### Path 1 — Direct merge
|
||
|
||
If your PR is well-scoped, passes CI, doesn't touch the trust-boundary
|
||
surface (auth / sandbox / publishing / branding), and doesn't conflict
|
||
with main, a maintainer merges it directly. This is the most common
|
||
outcome for small bug fixes and well-tested feature additions.
|
||
|
||
### Path 2 — Harvest
|
||
|
||
If your PR is large, mixes scope, conflicts with main, or needs polish
|
||
that's faster for the maintainer to apply than to round-trip with the
|
||
contributor, the maintainer may **harvest** the useful commits or hunks
|
||
into a new commit on `main` rather than merging the PR directly. This is
|
||
**not a rejection** — it means your code landed.
|
||
|
||
When this happens:
|
||
|
||
- The harvested commit's message includes `Harvested from PR #N by
|
||
@your-handle`. This is the contract: that line is your credit and the
|
||
signal that your contribution shipped.
|
||
- The `CHANGELOG.md` entry for the next release credits you by handle.
|
||
- The auto-close workflow closes your PR with a templated thank-you and
|
||
a link to the commit on `main`.
|
||
|
||
To make a future contribution land via the faster Direct-Merge path
|
||
instead of the Harvest path, the highest-leverage things you can do are:
|
||
|
||
1. **Keep PRs single-purpose.** One bug fix per PR; one feature per PR.
|
||
Don't mix a refactor with a feature.
|
||
2. **Rebase onto current `main` before opening the PR**, and after CI
|
||
feedback. Conflicts force the harvest path even when the change is
|
||
small.
|
||
3. **Include tests** with new behavior. The maintainer often harvests
|
||
PRs without tests because adding the test is faster than asking the
|
||
contributor for one.
|
||
4. **Avoid the trust-boundary surface** without prior maintainer
|
||
sign-off. That includes auth/credential flows, sandbox policy,
|
||
publishing/release plumbing, and `prompts/` content. PRs that touch
|
||
these without prior discussion are unlikely to merge directly even
|
||
when the change is well-implemented.
|
||
|
||
## Project Structure
|
||
|
||
codewhale is a Cargo workspace. The live runtime and the majority of TUI,
|
||
engine, and tool code currently live in `crates/tui/src/`. Smaller workspace
|
||
crates provide shared abstractions that are being extracted incrementally.
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
crates/
|
||
├── tui/ codewhale-tui binary (interactive TUI + runtime API)
|
||
├── cli/ codewhale binary (dispatcher facade)
|
||
├── app-server/ HTTP/SSE + JSON-RPC transport
|
||
├── core/ Agent loop / session / turn management
|
||
├── protocol/ Request/response framing
|
||
├── config/ Config loading, profiles, env precedence
|
||
├── state/ SQLite thread/session persistence
|
||
├── tools/ Typed tool specs and lifecycle
|
||
├── mcp/ MCP client + stdio server
|
||
├── hooks/ Lifecycle hooks (stdout/jsonl/webhook)
|
||
├── execpolicy/ Approval/sandbox policy engine
|
||
├── agent/ Model/provider registry
|
||
└── tui-core/ Event-driven TUI state machine scaffold
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
See [docs/ARCHITECTURE.md](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) for the live data flow across
|
||
these crates, including the bottom-up build order.
|
||
|
||
## Submitting Changes
|
||
|
||
1. Create a feature branch from `main`:
|
||
```bash
|
||
git checkout -b feat/your-feature
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
2. Make your changes and commit them
|
||
|
||
3. Ensure CI passes:
|
||
```bash
|
||
cargo fmt --check
|
||
cargo clippy
|
||
cargo test
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
4. Push your branch and create a Pull Request
|
||
|
||
5. Describe your changes clearly in the PR description
|
||
|
||
## Pull Request Guidelines
|
||
|
||
- Keep PRs focused on a single change
|
||
- Update documentation if needed
|
||
- Add tests for new functionality
|
||
- Ensure CI passes before requesting review
|
||
|
||
## Shape of a Typical PR
|
||
|
||
A well-structured PR follows a consistent pattern. Recent exemplars include:
|
||
|
||
- **#386** — `/init` command: new `crates/tui/src/commands/init.rs` module, project-type detection,
|
||
AGENTS.md generation, command registration in `commands/mod.rs`, localization strings.
|
||
- **#389** — Inline LSP diagnostics: LSP subsystem in `crates/tui/src/lsp/`, engine hooks in
|
||
`core/engine/lsp_hooks.rs`, config toggle, test coverage.
|
||
- **#387** — Self-update: new `crates/cli/src/update.rs` module, CLI subcommand registration,
|
||
HTTP download + SHA256 verification + atomic binary replacement.
|
||
- **#393** — `/share` session URL: new `crates/tui/src/commands/share.rs`, HTML rendering,
|
||
`gh gist create` integration, command registration.
|
||
- **#343/#346** — (v0.8.5) Runtime thread/turn timeline and durable task manager refactors.
|
||
|
||
Typically each PR touches 1–3 new files, modifies 2–5 existing files for wiring
|
||
(registries, dispatch matches, localization), and adds or updates tests. Changes
|
||
are scoped to a single feature or fix — if you discover related work that needs
|
||
doing, open a separate issue rather than expanding the PR scope.
|
||
|
||
Before submitting, run:
|
||
```bash
|
||
cargo fmt --check
|
||
cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features 2>&1 | head -50
|
||
cargo check
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Reporting Issues
|
||
|
||
When reporting issues, please include:
|
||
|
||
- Operating system and version
|
||
- Rust version (`rustc --version`)
|
||
- codewhale version (`codewhale --version`)
|
||
- Steps to reproduce the issue
|
||
- Expected vs actual behavior
|
||
- Relevant error messages or logs
|
||
|
||
## Code of Conduct
|
||
|
||
Be respectful and inclusive. We welcome contributors of all backgrounds and experience levels.
|
||
|
||
## License
|
||
|
||
By contributing to codewhale, you agree that your contributions will be licensed under the MIT License.
|
||
|
||
## Questions?
|
||
|
||
Feel free to open an issue for any questions about contributing.
|